The comments following the TechCrunch post about the new SanDisk/Yahoo media device quickly hammer home the generational difference in MP3 player usage and music consumption.

In a quote from a Yahoo guy about the device, he brings up the often-heard argument that “..we all know iPods are mostly full of not-paid-for MP3s.”, and then numerous people chime in with “mine are all legal, I ripped them from the CDs I own” argument. It is, however, the first comment in the sequence that makes this whole exchange interesting. Some young whippersnapper (19 years old we learn later in the comments) says “I don’t think you understand youth culture … most of my friends probably only know how to download and add illegal MP3’s as opposed to ripping their CD’s.”, which brought me to the realization that for us old fogies (I’m 34), we get to easily make the “ripped it from CD” argument because back in the day, the only way to acquire new music was to buy the CD/album, and this is the reason we have a box full of them collecting dust in the first place. The younger generation doesn’t have this constraint; it makes more sense for them to download the track than buy the CD and rip it, as those are just extra steps to the final result, which is an MP3 file.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen the argument that “All my downloaded music is legal”, it’s always “All my music is legal, because I ripped it from my CD collection”. As we move away from having to buy physical media to obtain new music, we’ll lose the “ripped from CD” argument, and we’ll be forced to deal with the legal versus illegal downloads issue in an even bigger way.

As I read the TechCrunch comment stream, I found it funny that the majority of comments about this “new media” device were made by the old-school crowd, those of us older than, say, 25. It reminded me of the Grumpy Old Man character Dana Carvey played on Saturday Night Live. “That was the way it was, and we liked it! We loved it!” And notice that I just referenced something that only us old folks will remember, to describe something that only us old folks will remember.

Twilight Zone theme plays…..wait, there it is again!

Jack Dorsey of Twitter and the L.A. Times Travel Show “How Will Travel Change You?” guy:

Many people have been asking us what tag to use for blog posts, Flickr pictures, etc. for the upcoming Podcast and New Media Expo 2007, so we’re going with newmediaexpo2007. Hope to see you there.

There’s always something in the fine print of the digital download services that are coming out these days that show the big media companies “Just Don’t Get It”, and Amazon Unboxed is no different.

I was looking into the Tivo/Amazon Unboxed integration, thinking how cool it is that you can remotely buy a movie, and it will be on your Tivo when you get home, when I spotted this gem:

What is the “Pay-TV Blackout Window”?
Due to restrictions from the video rights holders, most newly released movies will occasionally become temporarily unavailable for re-download from Your Media Library—even after they’ve already been purchased.

The video will be automatically replaced and made available to you through Your Media Library once the “Pay-TV Blackout Window” has ended.

Does this sound utterly ridiculous? That’s because it is.

This is the equivalent of buying a DVD, being able to watch it for a few weeks, then having a Showtime/HBO/Cinemax representative show up at your door and take away your DVD until their channel is done running that movie. I can see that the original intention was for the pay-TV channel to be able to secure exclusive rights to a movie via “digital distribution to a video signal-viewing device” (my legal mumbo-jumbo), but this goes a bit too far. As far as I can see, this doesn’t serve anyone’s best interest, and only serves to make the Unboxed service less attractive.

Yahoo’s upcoming You Witness News will allow user-generated photos and video to be uploaded to the service, to be used in news stories that will be posted on the site. Natali Del Conte’s post about this new service runs happily along until smashing headlong into a brick wall in the last sentence. She states that “As long as they’re just soliciting art and not writing, I’m okay with it.”

I’ll give her the benefit of the doubt, and assume that because she’s a writer, she wants to protect her little corner of the world, and let the photojournalists fend for themselves. To not stand up for other professionals, especially those so closely tied to syndicated/published writing, seems incredibly shortsighted to me. If the aim of You Witness News is to devalue well-constructed art, it can only be a matter of time before they will attempt to devalue well-constructed writing, and she will have then sold herself out.

We have said it time and time again on The Podcast Brothers that when negotiating the value of your content, you owe it to yourself and the podcasting/user-generated content community at large to make sure your content is not undervalued by those who would attempt to undervalue it in their own self interest. It seems Natali could use a bit more of this attitude, rather than throwing her photo-taking counterparts to the wolves.

At best, her attitude is selfish; at worst, it is a slap in the face to those who have an eye for “the shot”.

We’re becoming experts in troubleshooting MP3 album art problems with various MP3 players. This time, a listener of one of our podcasts informed us some of our shows were causing his Samsung YP-Z5AS MP3 player to lock up when it tried to play some of our MP3 files. We got the exact model number from the listener, and purchased an identical one online. It came via Fed Ex today, and we got down to business.

What we discovered was that it was the album art image we were using that was causing the problem. By removing the album art, the YP-Z5 played the file just fine. In a code editor, we opened the JPG file we were using as album art, and discovered something interesting:

What we’re seeing there is metadata embedded by Photoshop in the JPG file itself. Using Photoshop’s “Save for web” functionality, we produced a JPG file with no metadata in it. Using this “saved for web” file as album art in the MP3 file caused the YP-Z5 to work properly. The wildest thing is that we had been using the JPG with metadata as album art for a long time, and a lot of other MP3s with that JPG played just fine on the YP-Z5. There must be some combination of JPG file and other data in the MP3 that sets the YP-Z5 off.

The takeaway from this: always use the “Save for web” functionality in Photoshop if you are saving a JPG for use as album art in an MP3 file. Using the “Save as” functionality in Photoshop, then saving as a JPG embeds metadata in the JPG file, which can cause MP3 players to choke.

I just finished installing Internet Explorer 7, and noticed something interesting during the installation screens:

Notice anything interesting? I’ll give you a hint, here’s the IE6 home page at Microsoft.com (red rectangle inserted by me):

and here’s the IE7 home page at Microsoft.com (again, red rectangle inserted by me):

That’s right, up until now, Internet Explorer was called “Microsoft Internet Explorer”, meaning “The web browser that is created by Microsoft”. Now, Internet Explorer is called “Windows Internet Explorer”, meaning “The Web browser that belongs with/is intended for Windows”.

Here’s a couple more screen snippets, from the browsers themselves:

IE6, a.k.a. Microsoft Internet Explorer

IE7, a.k.a. Windows Internet Explorer

See the difference? It’s a subtle shift in Microsoft’s strategy in the ongoing browser wars, which I believe is meant to stop the advance of Firefox. For the technically savvy, Firefox will always be an option, but now, for the uninitiated, Firefox won’t look as attractive as “the browser that was meant for Windows”.

Edit: Ok, so I’m a little slow…Wikipedia’s entry on Internet Explorer first notes “Internet Explorer (known as Windows Internet Explorer in Windows Vista)…” on November 24, 2005

It appears that Yahoo Mail doesn't want you pulling in outside stylesheets. When our Trader Interviews email arrived in a Yahoo Mail account, the <link> tag to our CSS was replaced with an <xlink> tag, rendering it unusable. Googling around, it appears that xlink is a valid XHTML tag, but it appears that Yahoo is using it just to break links to outside stylesheets, since they also replace a <body> tag with <xbody>. Our workaround is to replace any <link> tags to outside stylesheets with the contents of that outside stylesheet, before an email is sent. Below is a test file with the function we use to do such a thing.

For the last two days, the SBC Global network has been having severe problems, cutting us off from our server for most of the business day:

We would love to have a redunadant cable modem link to the Net via Cox, except for one small problem; our landlord refuses to let Cox onto the premises. Cox has said they "don't have an agreement with the landlord", so they can't provide us service. We're guessing that the landlords have some sort of "agreement" (kickback) with SBC that they don't have with Cox, so they line their pockets, and we feel the pain. I wonder if the Public Utilities Commission would have some jurisdiction there? Has anyone else had this experience, where essentially a monopoly is created by your landlord's business practices?

You'll notice I don't blame SBC for this. I guess it's because I've come to accept flaky Internet service from any provider, and our solution has become to get redundant flaky links, in an attempt to create one good one.

I received an SMS message on my cell phone today, informing me that Cingular (my carrier) had a free phone for me, all I had to do was stop by my local Cingular store and .... etc. It also nicely told me to reply with 'STOP', and I would not receive marketing messages from them anymore. I did so, and was instantly sent another SMS message informing me I would "no longer receive marketing messages from Cingular. Please allow 10 days for your preferences to be updated".

You have to be kidding me. 10 days? Nothing takes 10 days anymore, especially when it comes to updating my SMS preferences. In 1860, the Pony Express got someone's 'preferences' (mail) from Missouri to California in the same amount of time.